DADADEL
A Christian teacher in a Kansas middle school secured a $95,000 settlement after being suspended for refusing to use a biologically female student’s preferred pronouns, citing her deeply held religious convictions.
The teacher argued that her rights to religious freedom were violated when she adhered to her belief that gender is assigned by God at birth.
In 2021, Pamela Ricard, a middle school math teacher at Fort Riley Middle School in Kansas since 2005, became the focus of a national debate on gender identity, religious freedoms, and school policies.
Ricard’s suspension stemmed from her decision to address a biologically female student by their legal last name, despite being informed by a school counselor that the student preferred an alternative first name.
The Christian teacher, citing her religious beliefs, rejected the request and instead addressed the student using their last name prefixed by the title “Miss.”
The teacher believed this compromise respected both the student’s identity and her religious values. However, the district suspended her under its “bullying and diversity and inclusion policies,” despite having no formal guidelines on gender pronouns at the time.
Frustrated by the lack of accommodation for her beliefs, the Christian teacher sought a religious exemption, which was denied multiple times. In a federal lawsuit filed in 2022, she argued that the Geary County School District violated her constitutional rights, including free speech, religious exercise, and due process.
The lawsuit also revealed that teachers were allegedly instructed to conceal a student’s preferred name and pronouns from parents if requested by the student.
“No school district should force teachers to deceive parents or compromise their religious convictions,” said Tyson Langhofer, director of the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal group that supported Ricard’s case. Her legal team argued that forcing educators to adopt policies on gender fluidity without regard to the First Amendment infringed on their rights.
Ricard’s attorney, Josh Ney, emphasized her commitment to treating every student with dignity throughout her career. He criticized the district for failing to extend the same fairness and respect to Ricard during the controversy.
The lawsuit concluded in a significant victory for the Christian teacher, with a $95,000 settlement just six months after filing. The district also agreed to expunge her record and acknowledged her good standing as an educator. Additionally, the school board revoked its policy requiring teachers to conceal students’ preferences from their parents.
“Schools must not force educators into deception or punish them for adhering to their religious beliefs,” Ney stated. He highlighted how this case set a precedent for the financial consequences school boards may face when disregarding teachers’ constitutional rights.
Ricard retired the same year she filed the lawsuit, leaving behind a legacy of standing firm for her beliefs while navigating the challenges of an evolving educational landscape.
