In a recent interview, actor Mel Gibson, 69, proposed a controversial theory regarding the devastating Los Angeles wildfires that destroyed his $23.5 million Malibu home. He suggested that the fires were “commissioned” to force residents off valuable properties.
The Palisades fire, which ignited on January 7, has scorched over 40,660 acres, destroyed nearly 12,500 structures, and claimed at least 24 lives, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
During an episode of Joe Rogan’s podcast on January 10, Mel Gibson learned of his home’s destruction. He later shared his sentiments with Fox News host Laura Ingraham, expressing a mix of sadness and acceptance, referring to the loss as a form of “purification.”
Mel Gibson’s theory centers on the belief that influential individuals or entities might have orchestrated the wildfires for financial or political gain. He questioned whether the fires were set intentionally, comparing the situation to historical “cattle barons” who cleared land for their purposes.
These statements have elicited mixed reactions. Supporters commend Mel Gibson for voicing unconventional perspectives, while critics label his claims as baseless and ill-timed, especially considering the ongoing suffering caused by the wildfires.
It’s important to note that there is no substantial evidence supporting Gibson’s assertions. The causes of wildfires are complex and multifaceted, often involving a combination of natural and human factors.
