In a move that has ignited public debate across the UK, the UK Foreign Office recently removed a portrait of the late Queen Elizabeth II and replaced it with pan‑African flag artworks by prominent contemporary artists — a switch that supporters see as a symbol of inclusivity, while critics interpret it as an erasure of national heritage.
What Changed?
The removed image was a 2014 photograph of the late monarch, taken by renowned photographer David Bailey, which had hung in the Foreign Office’s main corridor for years.
In its place now hangs work by British‑Ghanaian artist Larry Achiampong — specifically pieces from his “Relic Travellers’ Alliance” series, using pan‑African flag designs featuring 54 black stars symbolizing all African nations.
Other artworks by artists such as Lubaina Himid and Yinka Shonibare have also been installed in government spaces, aligning with this new decorative direction.
Why the Change?
Proponents of the new display argue that the updated art better reflects the UK’s multicultural society and acknowledges historically underrepresented voices. Achiampong has defended the move as part of his broader artistic mission to challenge nationalism and colonial legacies.
According to the government’s arts program, ministers hold the right to choose artworks from the Government Art Collection (GAC), which houses thousands of works. Such rotation of artworks is standard practice — but the current selections are seen by some as intentionally symbolic.
Public Reaction & Political Criticism
The decision has sparked strong reactions: critics, notably from the opposition party Reform UK, have labeled the removal of the Queen’s portrait “disrespectful” and accused the government of dishonouring British heritage.
One outspoken MP described the move as part of a broader pattern by current officials to “re‑write” history and dismiss established national symbols, arguing that government offices should reflect continuity and tradition.
On the other hand, supporters of the change argue that the old portrait primarily symbolized monarchy — and that modern Britain’s identity is more accurately represented by a diversity of cultures and perspectives, especially in institutions still shaping foreign policy and global relations.
