An unusual controversy has erupted online after users accused ChatGPT of applying unequal treatment to religious figures in image generation.
According to the critics, the platform is willing to create satirical or alternative depictions of Jesus — including versions representing different sexual identities — but refuses to generate similar images of the Prophet Muhammad.
In response to these claims, ChatGPT has stated that the policy is not based on bias or a “double standard,” but on a risk-assessment approach designed to minimize harm.
ChatGPT admits it’s a double standard, not based on fairness but to “minimize harm” and avoid “high-risk” content.
The explanation given is that content involving the Prophet Muhammad is considered “high-risk” due to the potential for severe real-world reactions, including threats of violence. For that reason, the system applies stricter limitations in order to avoid situations that could lead to real-life consequences for individuals or communities.
This reasoning has sparked a heated debate across social media: is this a necessary form of self-censorship in the interest of safety, or unequal treatment that undermines the principle of free expression?
While some users view the approach as responsible and protective, others see it as surrendering to fear and pressure — raising serious questions about the role of artificial intelligence in shaping the boundaries of speech in an increasingly polarized world.
