DADADEL
Recent research from Australia has shed light on the potential risks of continuing marijuana use after age 30.
The study tracked over 8,000 participants and revealed that people who smoked marijuana regularly in their 30s were more likely to experience setbacks in areas like income, education, and personal relationships. That suggests that prolonged cannabis use could hinder long-term life success.
Despite these findings, the study has its limitations. The data was drawn exclusively from a cohort of Australian mothers and their children, meaning that it may not be universally applicable.
The study also relied on information that might now be outdated, raising questions about its relevance to today’s broader population.
Furthermore, some of the “success” criteria, like homeownership or relationship status, may not be accurate indicators of life satisfaction for everyone.
Another important aspect to consider is the potential influence of other drug use, which the study did not account for in its analysis.
Researchers acknowledged that using multiple substances, or polydrug use, could have contributed to the negative outcomes, making it unclear whether marijuana alone was responsible for the trends observed.
The study highlights a significant point: while occasional marijuana use in younger years may not lead to failure, ongoing use into adulthood can present challenges.
Those who continue to smoke marijuana beyond age 30 could see negative effects on their work performance, financial stability, and interpersonal relationships. Moderation and caution are advised to avoid dependency and long-term consequences.
My only concern with this article is the final sentence: “Moderation and caution are advised to avoid dependency and long-term consequences.” The article is exceptionally well-written and maintains an objective tone throughout, except for this sentence.
Please understand this is not intended as pedantic criticism. I recognize the quality of the writing and could not have articulated it better myself. However, I am aware that some readers might dismiss the entire article due to this one sentence, reacting with undue criticism.
Perhaps rephrasing it to: “Moderation and caution are advised to avoid potential dependency and long-term consequences,” would better align with the article’s overall tone.
Consider the verbiage: “are advised”
We know psychedelic experiences are individual, and marijuana is no different. The individual’s experiences are not specifically surrounding a cohort, “specific individual characteristics” are relevant for the advisee. More of a “be safe” advisory than a “it’s gonna fuck your life up” thing.
I think this article was a waste of time and really doesn’t help. The government has been lying as usual about marijuana, it is a natural herb that helps! Please stop, explain Snoop dog, and millions of other people!